News

Morning, y’all! Burnout is real. Ask me how I know. I love these tips from Atlanta businesswomen on how to keep your soul from feeling like an overused dishcloth after all the work is done. My ...
Musk throws curveball in Trump agenda debate  U.S. Trade Court threatens Trump’s tariffs Trump ‘disappointed’ by warring Russia Hamas leader Mohammed Sinwar dead, ...
The legal basis underpinning Trump’s tariffs has been deemed unlawful by the US Court of International Trade. How have markets responded?
A federal U.S. court late Wednesday struck down the "reciprocal" tariffs that President Donald Trump imposed on the country's trading partners in early April, saying he had overstepped his authority.
A federal court in New York handed President Donald Trump a big setback Wednesday, blocking his audacious plan to impose massive taxes on imports from almost every country in the world.
A federal court is blocking President Donald Trump from imposing sweeping tariffs on imports under an emergency-powers law.
Reproduced from Reuters  By Dietrich Knauth and Daniel Wiessner NEW YORK, May 28 (Reuters) – A U.S. trade court blocked most of President Donald Trump’s tariffs in a sweeping ruling on ...
The massive tax and spending bill that has passed the House of Representatives would also further another priority of President Donald Trump: higher tariffs. The bill would codify into law several key ...
Both Trump and JD Vance have sent strong signals that the administration is willing to confront the court directly, but up to now Trump has avoided going to the brink. The courts are underdogs and in ...
Describing the atmosphere as a “high-risk situation,” UH President Wendy Hensel has issued a directive to leaders of UH system campuses to review their respective financial contingency plans “to ...
How are you feeling? How are you managing on the day-to-day given the worsening state of American democracy and rising authoritarianism? You lead an organization that is committed to defending civil ...
In leaping to defend the Trump Administration, the Court conveniently ignored a long-established precedent that prevented Presidents from firing independent-agency heads at will.